ANALISIS STRUKTURAL FABEL TEGODEK DAIT TETUNTEL: REPRESENTASI PERILAKU DALAM MASYARAKAT SASAK

Authors

  • Syaiful Bahri Kantor Bahasa NTB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v8i2.94

Keywords:

technique, interpreting, bekayat, Lombok

Abstract

This study analyzed structure of Tegodek Dait Tetuntel fable. Through these structures, it will be seen the role of each character in relationto the behavior of Sasak community based on the social levels . By using the structural analysis methods of Levi-Strau,it is shown that Tegodek and Tetuntel fable is not only presenting two main characters,  ‘Godek’ (monkey) and Tuntel (frogs/toads), but it is also presenting some phenomena of opposition figures such as ‘Godek’ is always insuperior position, while figures of Tuntel is always in inferior position. This indicates that ‘Godek’ figure is representation of a higher social class, while Tuntel is representation of a lower social class. Relating to the behavior, the ‘Godek’ character has a more active behavior, while the Tuntel figure tends to bea  passive behavior. If it is related to "working" activities, Tuntel figures have more knowledge than the characters of Tuntel. In relation to the behavior of revealing facts, the Tuntel figures tend to reveal something accordance with the facts, while the ‘Godek’ figures tend to precede the prestige that sometimes they do not meet the facts. When it is dealt with a problem solving, ‘Godek’ figures are more like doing intervention, whereas Tuntel figures to be relentless.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. (2001). Struturalisme Levi-Strauss: Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Yogyakarta: Galang Press.

Bahri, Syaiful. (2012). Menelisik Suku Sasak dari Fabel Tegodek dait Tetuntel. Dalam: Nurhadi dkk. (Ed.). Prosseding Konferensi Internasional Kesusastraan Indonesia (Buku 5: Sastra, Kultur, dan Subkultur). Yogyakarta: Hiski-UNY.

Eriyanto. (2013). Analisis Naratif: Dasar-dasar dan Penerapannya dalam Analisis Teks Berita Media. Jakarta: Kencana.

Husnan, Erwan dkk. (2008). “Penelitian Kekerabatan Bahasa-Bahasa Daerah: Tanah Asal dan Arah Migrasi Penutur Kosakata Alus Bahasa Sasak di Lombok”. Laporan Penelitian pada Kantor Bahasa Provinsi NTB. Mataram: Kantor Bahasa Provinsi NTB.

KBBI (Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia) versi offline dengan mengacu pada data dari KBBI Daring (edisi III) diambil dari http://pusatbahasa.diknas.go.id/kbbi/ sekarang berganti http://pusatbahasa.kemdiknas.go.id/kbbi/ Freeware ©2010-1011 by Ebta Setiawan.

Kraan, Alfonso Van Der. (2009). Lombok: Penaklukan, Penjajahan, dan Keterbelakangan 1870—1940. Yogyakarta: Lengge.

Mahsun. (2002). “Perlawanan Kultural: Kajian Konseptual-Teoretis terhadap Berbagai Perilaku Kultural Etnis Sasak”. Makalah disampaikan di depan Mahasiswa PKL dan Dosen Jurusan Ilmu Sejarah Univ. Muhammadiyah Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, di Universitas Mataram tanggal 16 Maret 2002.

______.“Dimensi Historis dalam Segmentasi Masyarakat Sasak”. Makalah diunduh dari website Prof. Mahsun tanggal 21 Januari 2014 Pk. 14.00.

______. “Etnis Sasak dalam Cermin Bahasa: Sebuah Renungan Introspektif”. Makalah diunduh dari website Prof. Mahsun tanggal 21 Januari 2014 Pk. 14.00.

Nizarjoe. (2011). “Pesan di Balik Dongeng Lawas Tetuntel-Tuntel dan Tegodek-Godek” diunduh di http://skepat-lombok.blogspot.com/2011/11/pesan-dibalik-dongeng-lawas-te-tuntel.htmltanggal 19 Agustus 2014 Pk. 23.08 Wib.

Safarudin, Balok dkk. (2010). “Orientasi Nilai Budaya Etnis Sasak yang Tercermin dalam Cerita Rakyatnya”. Laporan Penelitian pada Kantor Bahasa Provinsi NTB. Mataram: Kantor Bahasa Provinsi NTB.

Shubhi, Muhammad. (2011). “Analisis Struktural Cerita Cilinaye: Upaya Mengungkap Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Sasak”. Makalah dalam Diklat Jabatan Fungsional Peneliti Tingkat Pertama Golongan 24 Tahun 2011. Bogor: Pusbindiklat LIPI.

Published

2018-12-13

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract viewed = 403 times