PENERAPAN ESP DI PERGURUAN TINGGI UMUM (NON ENGLISH MAJORS) MELALUI PENDEKATAN CONTENT-BASED INSTRUCTION-CBT

Muhamad Nur

doi:10.62107/mab.v12i1.39

Authors

Muhamad Nur Sekolah Tinggi Managemen Informatika dan Komputer (STMIK) Bumigora Mataram Jl. Ismail Marzuki_Mataram-NTB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v12i1.39

Abstract

Mata Kuliah bahaa Inggris di perguruan tinggi umum (nonEnglish majors) di Indonesia pada umumnya adalah sebagai bagian dari mata kuliah pengembangan kepribadian. (MPK). Kelompok mata kuliah tersebut termasuk dalam kurikulum institusional yang isinya disesuaikan menurut ciri khas perguruan tinggi (PT) yang bersangkutan dengan mengacu kepada Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional (Kemendiknas) Nomor: 232/U/2000. Karena kurikulumnya disusun secara institusional, maka kurikulum dan silabus mata kuliah tersebut ditengarai tidak selalu mencerminkan ciri khas PT bersangkutan. Ciri khas dalam konteks pembelajaran bahasa Inggris ini hendaknya menerapkan bahasa Inggris untuk tujuan khusus (English for Specific Purposes yang disingkat ESP) dengan pendekatan CBT yang mengintegrasikan bahasa Inggris untuk akademik (English for Academic Purposes yang disingkat EAP) dan bahasa Inggris untuk pekerjaan atau profesi (English for Occupation yang disingkat EOP). Metode penelitian ini adalah bersifat deskriptif kualitatif terhadap data yang diperoleh dengan mengidentifikasi dan mengobservasi kurikulum dan silabus mata kuliah bahasa Inggris yang telah diterapkan sejak tahun 2007 pada delapan PT yang diperoleh secara acakbaik negeri maupun swasta serta jenis PT. Dari sejumlah silabus tersebut, dua diantaranya dilakukan survei langsung karena lokasinya terletak di daerah yang sama dengan PT penulis yang dikatagorikan sebagai data primer. Sedangkan lainnya diperoleh melalui penelusuran internet (online) yang dikatagorikan sebagai data sekunder. Berdasarkan data tersebut menunjukkan bahwa materi pembelajaran termasuk dalam tiga katagori, yakni; (1) English for General Purposes (data: PT-1, PT-2, dan PT-7), (2) English Grammar (data: PT-3, PT-4, dan PT-6), (3) ESP dan English for General (data PT-5, dan PT-8). Dengan demikian, tidak terdapat program studi dari sejumlah PT tersebut yang menerapkan pembelajaran ESP dengan pendekatan CBT pada mata kuliah bahasa Inggris yang mencerminkan ciri khas bidang keilmuannya pada semua PT tersebut.English course at nonEnglish majorsof Higher Education (HE) settings in Indonesia is part of a personal development courses ‘Matakuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian–MPK’. The course is including in the Institutional Curriculum, which its content is based on the related HE typical referring to the National Education Ministry Decree ‘Kepmendiknas’ Number 232/U/2000. Since the institutional curriculum is composed institutionally, so its content was assumed not always represent the related HE typical. The typical of English learning in this context is should applied the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) with CBT approach that integrate the English course for Academic purposes (EAP) related to the field of study and the English for Occupation Purposes (EOP) related to the job or profession in the future. The research method was a qualitatif descriptif which was conducted through identification and observation of the curriculum and syllaby of English course that had been applied since 2007.at eight states and private, and types of the HE that taken randomly. Referring to the collected syllabus, two were taken throughdirectly survey because the location was the same region with the author which categorized as the primer data, and the others cattegorized as the seconder data which were taken through internet access. Based on the data, it is shown that the learning materials of the HE were included into three categories; (1) English for General Purposes (data HE-1, HE-2, andHE-7), (2) English Grammar (data HE-3, HE-4, andHE-6), (3) ESP and English for General (dat HE-5, andHE-8). Therefore, none of the study program was applied the ESP with CBT approah for the English course that representing the field of study at all those of HE.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alemi, Minoo dan Ebadi, Saman. (2010). The Effects of Pre-reading Activities on ESP Reading Comprehension. Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran: ACADEMY PUBLISHER. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 569--577.

Braxton, S. (2003). General Instructional Design Phases. Retrieved on November 24th, 2006 from http://www.futureu.com/publications/braxton/general_phases.html

Beshaj, Lediana. (2015). The Growing Importance of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in Albanian Higher Education. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (LJSELL) Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2015, PP 10-13 ISSN 2347-3126 (Print) & ISSN 2347-3134.

Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A., & Wesche, M.B. (1989). Content-based Second Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Brinton, Snow, & Wesche. (1989) dalam wikipedia® of the WikipediaFoundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Akses 22/02/2012.

Čižinauskienė dan Poškienė. (2001). English for Science and Technology (EST) at the Level of Master Studies. KALBŲ STUDIJOS .Journal. Studies About Languages. No.1. ISSN 1648--2824.

Chamot, Anna Uhl. (2004). Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. National University of Singapore. © Centre for Language Studies. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 14--26.

Chen, Yong. (2006). From Common Core to Specific. British Virgin Island. The Asian ESP Journal. Vol. 1(3). p.2.

Crandall, J. dkk. (987). Integrating language and content instruction for language minority students.Teacher Resource Guide Series, Number 4 September 1987. http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/classics/trg/04integrating.htm.

Crandall, J. dan Tucker, G. R. (1990). Content-based instruction in second and foreign languages. In A. Padilla, H. H. Fairchild and C. Valadez (eds.) Foreign Language Education: Issues and Strategies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Direktorat Akademik-Direktorat jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2008). Buku Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Pendidikan Tinggi. Sebuah Alternatif Penyusunan Kurikulum. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Hlm.5.

Dudley-Evans T. (2001). English for Specific Purposes, in Carter R. And Nunan D. (Eds). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dudley-Evans T. and St. John M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, Heidi dan Squres, Todd. (2006). Good Practices for ESP Programs in Japanese Post-secondary Institutions. The Japan Association for Language Teaching. Volume 30, Number 9. hlm. 17.

Fadjar, A. Malik. (2002). Menteri Pendidikan Nasiona. Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor: 045/U/2002. Tentang Kurikulum Inti Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta.

Gatehouse, K. (2001). Key issues in English for Specific Purposes: (ESP) Curriculum development. TESL Journal Vol. VII, No.10, October 2001,

http://www.iteslj.org/Articles/Gatehouse-ESP.html, Retrieved August, 2006.

Hewings. A history of ESP through English for Specific Purposes, dalam http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_3/Hewings_paper.htm/, diakses 02/09/2010.

Hutchinson, T, & Waters, W. (1987). English for Specific Purposes-A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson, Tom, dan Waters Alan. (2006). English for Specific Purposes. 22nd printing. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, K. & Johnson, H. (1999). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Kavaliauskienė, Galina. (2004). Research into the Integration of Content-Based Instruction into the ESP Classroom. Journal of Language and Learning. Vol.2, No.2. ISSN 1740-4983. Law University of Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Kusni. (2007). Reformulasi Perancangan Program ESP di Perguruan Tinggi. Universitas Negeri Padang. Linguistik Indonesia, Tahun ke 25, No. 1.

Luo, Jing dan Mark Garner. (2017).The Challenges and Opportunities for EnglishTeachers in Teaching ESP in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, (8),1, pp.81-85

Marìa, Dueñas. (2004). The Whats, Whys, Hows and Whos of Content-Based Instruction in Second/Foreign Language Education. Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia. All rights reserved. IJES, vol. 4 (1), 2004, pp. 73-96.

Marina, Valerija dan Marmienė, Auksė. (2006). Text-Based Language Teaching and the Analysis of Tasks Presented in English Course Books for Students of Information Iechnology and Computing. Santalka. Filologija. Edukologija. 2006, T. 14, Nr. 2. ISSN 1822–430X print 1822–4318 online.

Miarso, Yusuf Hadi. (1987). Penelitian Instruksional PUA Survey Model Pengembangan Instruksional. Jakarta: Depdikbud: Dirjen Dikti.

Mo, Huanran. (2005). A Brief Review of English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Zhuhai Campus, Zunyi Medical College. US-China Foreign Language, ISSN1539-8080, USA. Volume 3, No.7 (Serial No.22).

Muhaimin, Yahya, A. (2000). Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Keputusan Mendiknas RI., Nomor: 232/U/2000. Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jakarta.

Naqvi dan Mathew. (2010). ESP Course for IT Students at the Middle East College of Information Technology, Sultanate of Oman: Design and Application Language Education in Asia, 2010, vol. 1(1), 242-257.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based Language Teaching. United Kingdom Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nur, Muhamad. (2017). Pengembangan Kompetensi Komunikatif Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik Informatika dalam English for Academic Purposes (Studi Kasus di STMIK Bumigora Mataram. Seminar Nasional TIK dan Ilmu Sosial (Socio Tech).STMIK Bumigora Mataram, ISBN: 978-602-17488-2-4

Professional Development for Language Teachers Implementing the TexasEssential Knowledge and Skills for Languages Other Than English (TEKS for LOTE). (1997). Project ExCELL Excellence and Challenge: Expectations for Language Learners Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Texas Education Agency. http://www.google.co.id/search?hl= id&source=hp&q=pdf+ language+teaching+model&gbv=2&oq=pdf+language+teaching+model&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=15375l24672l0l25891l27l27l0l19l19l0l359l1468l2-5.1l6l0. diakses 08/03/2012.

Rahardjo, Mudjia. (2010). Triangulasi dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Artikel http://mudjiarahardjo.uin-malang.ac.id/artikel/270.html,akses 07/12/201.3

Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Ro’isatin, U. Anis. (2006). Kajian Tentang Pengajaran ESP di Jurusan Rekayasa. Politeknik negeri malang : Jurnal ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Vol.2 No.1ISSN 1858- 2265. hlm. 129-134.

Saricoban. (1999). Http://wiki.answers.com/Q/what_is_receptive_-_productive_skill/. Akses 25/02/2012.

Sarré and Whyte. (2016). Research in ESP teaching and learning in French higher education: developing the construct of ESP didactics. Research in ESP teaching and learning in French higher education: developing the construct of ESP didactics », ASp [Online], 69 | 2016, Online since 01 March 2017, connection on 05 March 2017. URL :http://asp.revues.org/4834 ; DOI : 10.4000/asp.4834.

Savichuk, V.Ya. (2010). Linking Profession and Language: Content-Based Instruction in English for Specific Purposes to Hospitality and Tourism Students. The Department of Foreign Languages for the Students of Natural Sciences and Mathematics.таВНЗ. 8.

Silver, R.E. dkk. (2007). Language Education in China, Japan, and Singapore. National Institute of Education- Nanyang Technological University. I Nanyang Walk publisher. Singapore.

Sofyan, Liya, A.S. (2004). Pengajaran ESP pada Tingkat Perguruan Tinggi. Unika Atma Jaya.

Suharso. tanpa Thn. Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris melalui ‘Content-Based Instruction’. Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

http://www.google.co.id/search?hl=id&source=hp&q=pdf+PEMBELAJARAN+BAHASA+INGGRIS+MELALUI+CONTENT-BASED+INSTRUCTION+ suharso +&gbv=2&oq=pdf. akses, juli 2011.

Supriatna, Dadang, dan Mulyadi, Mochamad. (2009). Konsep Dasar desain Pembelajaran. Bahan Ajar untuk Diklat E-Training PPPPTK TK dan PLB. Pusat Pengembagan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga kependidikan Taman kanak-kanak dan Pendidikan Luar Biasa.

Wesche, M. B. & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PENERAPAN ESP DI PERGURUAN TINGGI UMUM (NON ENGLISH MAJORS) MELALUI PENDEKATAN CONTENT-BASED INSTRUCTION-CBT

Authors

DOI:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Published

Issue

Section